Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOI Jion | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 2 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 3 | SHANG Arianna | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | - |
| 3 | CHRISTENSEN Nora | - | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | BARTHOLOMEW-GIRARD Francesca | - | - | - | - | 6% | 50% | 44% |
| 6 | PANNONE Elisa | - | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | |
| 7 | ZHOU Sophia | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | RADVANY Simone | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 9 | MANGLANI Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | IREZ Lyra | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
| 11 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | VAN DE VELDE Cecile | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | POLING Katherine | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 1% |
| 15 | LOPES Julia | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | CHUNG Stella | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 17 | HARROLD Sophia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 18 | PACHECO Dana | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | CHEN Miley | 1% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | VAYNBERG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 51% | 13% |
| 21 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | YEE Melania | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | PANTHA Priya | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 24 | MULLER Amara | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | IRVINE Emma | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | - |
| 26 | PRASAD Mohisha | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | GARCIA Alysia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 28 | WANG Grace | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 29 | MANNING Lynne | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 30 | BALDWIN Aimi | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 31 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 32 | BURNHAM Clarice | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MCAULEY Grace | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 46% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ATTICKS rachel | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 21% | 48% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | CARDENTE Gwendolyn | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | BUNKELMAN Maelle | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | GOLDEN Mekayla | < 1% | 5% | 25% | 43% | 26% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Jingyao | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | FENTON Barbara R. | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.