Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
2 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% |
3 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
3 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
5 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
6 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | |
6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
8 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
9 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
10 | FU Qihan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
11 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
12 | WU Celine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
14 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | |
15 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
16 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
17 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
18 | YAO Ada | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
19 | HU Felice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
20 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
21 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
23 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
24 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% | |
25 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
26 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
27 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
28 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
29 | ROY Layla | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
31 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
33 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
34 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
35 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
36 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | - |
38 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
39 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% | |
40 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
41 | NAGER Abigail | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
42 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
43 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
44 | CHENG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
45 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
46 | QIAN Jade | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
47 | ZHANG Elaine | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
48 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
49 | FORNES Jolie A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
50 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 95% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | |
51 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
52 | JHAVERI Sanjana | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | DESOLA Lucy | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
54 | JI Eva | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
55 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
56 | GAO Anna | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
57 | CHAGARES Isabella | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
58 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
59 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
60 | TANG Sophia | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
61 | KUTTIKAT Sanjana | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
62 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - | |
63 | ZHANG Alina | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | ZHU Elise | 100% | 93% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
65 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
66 | JIN Wendy | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.