Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PHAIR Meghan D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | CHOY Ida | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | WOLF Lisa A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | TOLLEY Toby | D V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 8 | CAFASSO Sabrina | D D D V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 9 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | BRISK Angelica A. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | JENSEN MJ | D V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | BYRON Karen J. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 13 | SCHELTZ Kimberly | D D V V D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 14 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | D V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 15 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | INAMDAR Nina S. | V D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | REYNOLDS Nancy | D D V V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | MONTOYA Amy C. | D V D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 21 | SANCHEZ-EMDEN Marta | V D D V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 22 | ALVAREZ Letizia | D V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 23 | BOWIE Charlotta | D V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | SISE Camilla R. | V V D D D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 25 | WHEELER Michele L. | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | DANCER Adrienne | D D D V D V | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 27 | BRODEUR Andrea | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 28 | SIMON Sally R. | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 29 | BECK Sara | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 30 | SETO Karen | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | DREW Dorothea M. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | TUCKER Ellen | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 34 | CARNEY Jennifer | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.