dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | LIM William J. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% | |
2 | GUFFEY christopher | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
3 | CRAIG Samuel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
3 | HONG Rubin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
5 | CHON Collin | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
6 | WITEK bernard J. | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 48% | 36% | |
7 | ZHOU William | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
8 | KIM elijah | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
9 | CHOI Silas | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% | |
10 | REN James | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
11 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
12 | HUBLALL ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
13 | KIM Alexander M. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
14 | LI Huangziyue | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | - | |
15 | ZHANG Kaixuan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% | |
16 | BOLLU Viren | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | - | |
17 | GONZALEZ jake | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 8% |
18 | LIN nicole | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
19 | AN Damon | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | DIXON Allan | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | |
21 | BOSITA brennan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 1% | - |
22 | PANG Hi Yui | - | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
23 | KIM yusung | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
24 | CHEN Kevin | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
25 | BOSITA Carson | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
26 | ZHAN sophie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - | |
27 | LEE brady | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
28 | KOTVALI Aneesh | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
29 | SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | WANG Alex | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | LIU guanyu | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | KIM Karen | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - | |
33 | VEDRE Neil | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
34 | DE SOUZA CABRERO Yorrick | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | SUH Leo | 2% | 40% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
36 | TURIANO nadelle | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
37 | WITEK Isabelle | 41% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - | |
38 | ROH jaden | 24% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - | |
39 | NAMBIAR navin | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | SALMAN hamzah | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
41 | SMITH Etienne | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
42 | CHEN Shawn | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | KU Alathea-joy | < 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
44 | HAM Elizabeth | 21% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.