Valkyrie Fencing Club - Pleasant Grove, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANSEN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 
| 2 | STOREY Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
| 3 | STORKEL Adam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 3 | JAN Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 15% | - | 
| 5 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 4% | |
| 6 | DELISLE Jonas P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 7 | GAN Shelby | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | MACK Jason A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | 
| 9 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | 
| 10 | MARTINEZ HANSEN Dayana C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 17% | 
| 11 | SUCHOSKI Annika | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | JIA Amy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% | |
| 13 | LITTLE Alex | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | LONG OKURA Rebecca | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | 
| 15 | PULLARA Ashley | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | DAVIDSON James | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | PARKEY Jack O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 18 | WALL Peter M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 19 | MAURIN Michael | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% | |
| 20 | CHADWICK Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | GARDNER William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 4% | |
| 22 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% | - | - | 
| 23 | RYGG Ellis | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% | - | 
| 24 | MICHAELIS Stephanina | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | MITCHELL Shelby J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | LIMA Roberto M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | - | 
| 27 | MATHESON Ender | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | - | 
| 28 | GARRISON Shawn | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 29 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 11% | - | - | - | 
| 30 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | SZTAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 33 | NETHERY Lauren M. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | LEE Micah | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | PASSERAUB Philippe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | LEE Patrick | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | 
| 37 | WARNICK Sydney | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | HILL Amelia | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.