Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
2 | KILARI Krish | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
3 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
3 | WANG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
5 | PI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
6 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
7 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
8 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
9 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
10 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
11 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
12 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
13 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 12% |
14 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
15 | GOLDIN Lucca | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
16 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
17 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
18 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
19 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
20 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
21 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
22 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
23 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
24 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
25 | RADJABLI Maximillian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
25 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
27 | CHEEMA Hyder | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
30 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
31 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
32 | JONES Graham H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
33 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
34 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
35 | KIM Kendrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
36 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
37 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
38 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 8% |
39 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
40 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
40 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
42 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
43 | BENSON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
44 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
45 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
46 | CAO Donald | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
47 | LI Ayden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
48 | LUHAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
49 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
50 | LIU Victor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
51 | HERNANDEZ Stanton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
52 | WANG Max | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
53 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
54 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
55 | KWON Kenneth | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
56 | BEATY Chad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
57 | ANAND Rishab | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
58 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
59 | BOLLU Viren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
60 | CRAIN Bennett | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | IYER Neil | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
62 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
63 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
64 | GOLDMAN Ben S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
65 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
66 | CHINWAH Kaden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
67 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
68 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
69 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
70 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
71 | HUBLALL Ethan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
72 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
73 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
74 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
75 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
76 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
77 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
78 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
79 | KO Zuriel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
80 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
81 | HUA Michael | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
82 | KOTVALI Aneesh | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
83 | TURNER Benjamin | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
84 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
85 | YAN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | |
86 | ZLATINSKI Jason | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
87 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
88 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
89 | WAGNER Elijah | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
90 | WANG William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
91 | GONG Gavin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
92 | LEE Brady | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
92 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
94 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
95 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
96 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
97 | BLINKOV Andrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 40% |
97 | DOLEV Ido | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
99 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
100 | JHAVERI Rajan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
101 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
102 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
103 | XU Ivan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
103 | NAMBIAR Navin | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
105 | ZAYAS Devin A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
106 | JENSBY Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
107 | FARIDI Imran | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
108 | KLEBS Robert | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
109 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
109 | BARROWS Hunter | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
111 | GAY Jono | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
112 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
113 | HALL Noah | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
114 | KETT Richard | 100% | 82% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
115 | YADAV Lakshya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
116 | RAMANI Ari | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | CHEN Shawn | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
118 | XUE Leo | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
119 | AUTREY Adrien | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
120 | KURILO Michael | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
120 | HIBINO Uta | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
122 | HAYES David | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
123 | HO Jacob | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
123 | BROCKMEYER Tyler | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
125 | BURKE Sam | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
126 | CUNLIFFE Sebastian | 100% | 65% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
126 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.