National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Div I-A Men's Saber

Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 22%
2 KILARI Krish 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
3 GHAYALOD ansh 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 26%
3 WANG Samuel 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 23%
5 PI Alexander 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
6 CHEONG Heonjun 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 44%
7 LAUB William 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
8 LIU Kevin 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 5%
9 RAMANAN Jaisimh 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 11%
10 YANG Phillip 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
11 KOVALEV Daniil N. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 43% 11%
12 SIDDIQUI Shayan 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 7%
13 ANDRES Michael 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 43% 12%
14 SU Landon 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
15 GOLDIN Lucca 100% 97% 84% 55% 24% 6% 1%
16 HOLMES Aiden G. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 68% 24%
17 ZHANG Kaixuan 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
18 ZHAO Lucas 100% 100% 98% 90% 68% 34% 8%
19 CONTRACTOR Cyrus 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
20 BAUER Hank E. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 20%
21 ANAND Rohan 100% 99% 90% 66% 33% 9% 1%
22 YERRAMILLI Tejas 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 9%
23 TSAO Oliver 100% 99% 95% 77% 45% 16% 2%
24 SUBA Lucas 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
25 RADJABLI Maximillian 100% 99% 91% 69% 36% 10% 1%
25 LI Yidong A. 100% 98% 87% 58% 25% 6% 1%
27 CHEEMA Hyder 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 2%
28 ATWOOD Griffin 100% 93% 68% 33% 9% 1%
29 POFF Kainoa 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
30 LINDHOLM Oliver S. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
31 SADHU Neiyam 100% 98% 86% 58% 25% 6% 1%
32 JONES Graham H. 100% 100% 98% 89% 64% 29% 6%
33 ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 12%
34 SO Preston 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 12%
35 KIM Kendrick 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 22% 3%
36 LEE Andrew 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
37 HUANG Alex F. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 41%
38 BOSITA Carson 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 41% 8%
39 KALPATHY Rohit 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 10%
40 YANG Dylan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 41% 8%
40 KANG Evan 100% 100% 96% 82% 52% 20% 3%
42 MUNGUIA Nathan 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 46% 13%
43 BENSON Jacob 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1% -
44 KOGAN Nikita 100% 98% 84% 52% 18% 2%
45 MEYERSON Jacob 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 9%
46 CAO Donald 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% -
47 LI Ayden 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1%
48 LUHAN Zachary 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 37% 8%
49 BARRIOS Diego 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 19% 3%
50 LIU Victor 100% 99% 90% 66% 32% 9% 1%
51 HERNANDEZ Stanton 100% 99% 89% 64% 30% 7% 1%
52 WANG Max 100% 97% 81% 51% 20% 4% -
53 BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3%
54 CAO Oliver 100% 99% 89% 61% 24% 4%
55 KWON Kenneth 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% -
56 BEATY Chad A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
57 ANAND Rishab 100% 98% 85% 56% 24% 5% 1%
58 PORTER Dupree 100% 99% 93% 74% 41% 14% 2%
59 BOLLU Viren 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
60 CRAIN Bennett 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
61 IYER Neil 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% -
62 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) 100% 99% 93% 71% 38% 11% 1%
63 RAMANAN Govind 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
64 GOLDMAN Ben S. 100% 99% 90% 65% 28% 5%
65 HWANG Jayden 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 17%
66 CHINWAH Kaden 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
67 WESLER Logan A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 20%
68 DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
69 GERSTMANN Max T. 100% 97% 74% 34% 8% 1% -
70 GREMILLION Obadiah 100% 94% 71% 34% 9% 1%
71 HUBLALL Ethan 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 2%
72 KIM Theodore 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 4% -
73 STAMIS Kyle 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 4%
74 MANESCU Miron 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
75 DECK Tyson 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
76 FELDMAN Drew 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 38% 7%
77 LIM Brandon 100% 94% 70% 31% 7% 1% -
78 CHEN Kevin 100% 67% 26% 6% 1% - -
79 KO Zuriel 100% 97% 80% 50% 20% 4% -
80 VEDRE Neil 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% - -
81 HUA Michael 100% 92% 63% 28% 8% 1% -
82 KOTVALI Aneesh 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
83 TURNER Benjamin 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% - -
84 FOX Gavin 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
85 YAN William 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 19%
86 ZLATINSKI Jason 100% 84% 46% 15% 2% -
87 CHEN Jonathan 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
88 POSY Daniel 100% 93% 68% 33% 9% 1%
89 WAGNER Elijah 100% 79% 39% 11% 1% -
90 WANG William 100% 99% 93% 69% 31% 6%
91 GONG Gavin 100% 98% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
92 LEE Brady 100% 91% 63% 29% 8% 1% -
92 ANUMULA Aryan 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
94 ONG Dylan 100% 92% 64% 29% 8% 1% -
95 WITCZAK Mateus 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
96 RIGGINS Littleton K. 100% 98% 88% 62% 29% 7% 1%
97 BLINKOV Andrey 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 40%
97 DOLEV Ido 100% 96% 77% 45% 16% 3% -
99 DESAUTELS Connor 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1% -
100 JHAVERI Rajan 100% 80% 41% 12% 2% - -
101 DESSAUER Tobyn M. 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
102 SHANKWILER Christopher 100% 97% 80% 46% 14% 2%
103 XU Ivan 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% -
103 NAMBIAR Navin 100% 77% 35% 8% 1% -
105 ZAYAS Devin A. 100% 97% 82% 51% 19% 3%
106 JENSBY Jason 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 9% 1%
107 FARIDI Imran 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
108 KLEBS Robert 100% 95% 76% 44% 16% 3% -
109 BOULAIS Andrew D. 100% 96% 78% 47% 17% 3% -
109 BARROWS Hunter 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% - -
111 GAY Jono 100% 98% 87% 59% 26% 6% 1%
112 HUANG Alexander C. 100% 99% 90% 64% 31% 8% 1%
113 HALL Noah 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1% -
114 KETT Richard 100% 82% 44% 15% 3% - -
115 YADAV Lakshya 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 3% -
116 RAMANI Ari 100% 52% 12% 1% - - -
117 CHEN Shawn 100% 82% 43% 12% 2% - -
118 XUE Leo 100% 81% 40% 11% 2% -
119 AUTREY Adrien 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% -
120 KURILO Michael 100% 89% 51% 15% 2% - -
120 HIBINO Uta 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% - -
122 HAYES David 100% 92% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
123 HO Jacob 100% 91% 64% 30% 9% 1% -
123 BROCKMEYER Tyler 100% 82% 44% 14% 3% - -
125 BURKE Sam 100% 82% 44% 14% 3% - -
126 CUNLIFFE Sebastian 100% 65% 25% 5% 1% - -
126 KARAVAS Nicholas 100% 88% 53% 17% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.