Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHAN Matthew | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
2 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
3 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
3 | MORRILL William | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
5 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
6 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | |
7 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
8 | SAGARDI David | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
9 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
10 | YUN Jake | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
11 | LEE Justin | - | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
12 | FENG Leo | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
13 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
14 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
15 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
16 | MALONE Gregory D. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
17 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
18 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
19 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
20 | TURCK Caspar J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
21 | HONG Steven | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
22 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% | |
23 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
24 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
25 | DENG Andrew | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
26 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
27 | WAXLER Seth B. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
28 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
30 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
31 | CLARK Gabriel | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
32 | SHTEIN Yan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
33 | REN James | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
34 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
35 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
36 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
37 | GILSON Lucas B. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
38 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
39 | HOPPA Luke H. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
39 | WANG Robert | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
41 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
42 | BROU Inkosi | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - |
43 | PENG Bryan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
44 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
45 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% | 1% | |
46 | WU Richard | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
47 | CHENG Cody | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
48 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
49 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
50 | OH Triton | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
51 | LEONARD Charles | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
52 | CHUANG Tristan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
53 | LEE Derek J. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | LIN Steve | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
55 | CHO Winston | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
56 | DOWNEY Baran | 1% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
57 | ZHANG Derek | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
58 | ZENG Noah | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
59 | HUNG Samuel | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 30% | |
60 | KESSLER Nathan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
61 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
62 | BAE Jason I. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
63 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
64 | GIZERSKY Jared | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
65 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
66 | LIN Philip T. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
67 | CHICA - HERRERA Brian | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
68 | SAVOY Luca | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
69 | WEIL Asher D. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
70 | FLITSANOV Macabee | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
71 | PARKER Benjamin D. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
72 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
73 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
74 | CHO Blake | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
75 | YU Thomas | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
76 | GUREVICH Savely | 32% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
77 | LUCAS Hayden | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
78 | SHU Tony | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
79 | WASSERMAN Aiden | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
80 | YAO Kevin | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
81 | HALTON Mateo F. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
82 | ONG Chinli | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
83 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
84 | GONG Zihao | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
85 | MANGAN Daniel Marsh | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
86 | LIN Hadrian | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
87 | MARGULIS Jared | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
88 | GONG Ziqian | < 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
89 | CHENG Hong | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
90 | MATTOO Surya | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
91 | JOSEF Asher | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
92 | CHANG Yuyang | 28% | 48% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
93 | PENG Victor | 10% | 37% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
94 | GREENBAUM Max B. | 45% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | |
95 | MATTOO Deven | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
96 | TANG Charles | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
96 | FTAIHA Ezra | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
98 | WITCZAK Mateus | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.