Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | BELL Scott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 2 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 3 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 3 | BECKER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 55% |
| 5 | CALAY Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 6 | GOODMAN Jason M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 10 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
| 11 | BOLAKOWSKI John M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 71% | 21% |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | LOBELLE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 15 | MCGRATH Polina S. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | ZEHE Michele A. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 17 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | HOORNSTRA David S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 19 | CASS-CALAY Shannon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | EDWARDS Jeffrey E. | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
| 21 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 100% | 87% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 22 | HEWITT Lisa M. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 23 | KYLMAN Andrew | 100% | 95% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.