Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIMONOV Olga | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
2 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
3 | PHAIR Meghan D. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 62% |
3 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
5 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
6 | ROVATI Caterina | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 62% | 21% |
7 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
8 | SISE Camilla R. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
9 | BYRON Karen J. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
10 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - |
11 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
12 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 43% | 10% | |
13 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
14 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
15 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
16 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
17 | HAMMONDS Carissa | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | < 1% | |
18 | LOVE Georgina | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
19 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
20 | DUSINLLEUX Kate D. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
21 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
22 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
23 | BALDASTY Katherine | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
24 | BURNHAM Elizabeth (Liz) A. | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% | - |
25 | INAMDAR Nina S. | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 5% | |
26 | BRODEUR Andrea | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
27 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
27 | REED Juliya | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
29 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
30 | MONGI Holly L. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | WHEELER Michele L. | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | SCHLEE Selma | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
34 | SIMON Sally R. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | - | - |
35 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | BRASTED Karen (Maggie) E. | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | SETO Karen | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | ALVAREZ Letizia | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | TUCKER Ellen | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | KELLY Diane A. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.