Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIMONOV Olga | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 2 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | PHAIR Meghan D. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 62% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 5 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 6 | ROVATI Caterina | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 62% | 21% |
| 7 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
| 8 | SISE Camilla R. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | BYRON Karen J. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 11 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 12 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 43% | 11% | |
| 13 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 14 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 18% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | HAMMONDS Carissa | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | < 1% | |
| 18 | LOVE Georgina | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | DUSINLLEUX Kate D. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 22 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | BALDASTY Katherine | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | BURNHAM Elizabeth (Liz) A. | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 25 | INAMDAR Nina S. | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 4% | |
| 26 | BRODEUR Andrea | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | REED Juliya | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 29 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MONGI Holly L. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WHEELER Michele L. | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | SCHLEE Selma | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | SIMON Sally R. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - | - |
| 35 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BRASTED Karen (Maggie) E. | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | SETO Karen | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | ALVAREZ Letizia | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | TUCKER Ellen | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KELLY Diane A. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.