Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HO Kasper | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
2 | LIN Allen | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
3 | YETCHERLA Aarya | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
3 | YANG Arthur | 15% | 55% | 27% | 3% | < 1% | - |
5 | MANE Reyansh | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
6 | DONG YIKUN | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | < 1% |
7 | HE Andrew | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
8 | SINGH Aditi | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
9 | ZHENG Ivan | 63% | 32% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
10 | JUNG Ryan | - | 1% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% |
11 | ZHANG Andrew | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
12 | MAHAJAN Mira | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
13 | LEW Abigail | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
14 | KOCHAK Rivan | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
15 | TAKEUCHI Spencer | 1% | 11% | 50% | 32% | 6% | - |
16 | WILLIAMS Andre | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% |
17 | ZHENG Jasper | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
18 | CHITTURI Rajiv | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 41% | 9% |
19 | TANG Evelyn | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
20 | MALPICA Tao | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
21 | MAI Everett | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
22 | WU Harvey | - | 23% | 49% | 25% | 3% | - |
23 | VUNDAVALLY Aarna | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
24 | LAU Ryan Arwin | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.