Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 2 | WONG David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 22% |
| 3 | LEE Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 6 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 7 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 8 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 9 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 31% |
| 10 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 11 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 12 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
| 13 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 14 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 71% | 38% | 10% |
| 15 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | SU Kingston | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 19 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 21 | ZHOU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
| 22 | KITSON Chase | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 16% |
| 25 | LEE Brady | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 28 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 29 | VO Landon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | LI linze | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | GARDNER David | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | WU Yiyang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 33 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 34 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | FAN Hsiao-Kai(Kai) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 36 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | CAO Donald | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 39 | IYER Neil | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 42 | CHI Everett | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 45 | LEE Brandon | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 50 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 51 | CHEN Shawn | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 53 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 56 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | HO Anson | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 58 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HONG Aidan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HENRY Ethan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | LIAO Yifong | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | CHEN Yuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 64 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | WONG Ron | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LE Long | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 68 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | KULKARNI Shreyas | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | VOSPER James | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.