Prime F. Osborn III Convention Center - Jacksonville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 3 | EVANS George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 5 | ECHEVARRIA Axel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% |
| 6 | TUDELA Francisco | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 7 | FORAKER Hudson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 9 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 10 | WERTH Mario | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% | |
| 11 | KARLEKAR Veer | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | SALLAI Abel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 13 | WU Robert | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 15 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 16 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | PHELPS Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | ||
| 19 | LEE Sean | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | BIROAN Chaz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 21 | VENZON Gavin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | BEAU DE ROCHARS Josh | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 5% | ||
| 24 | MORRISON Kieren | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | MILETIC-RIOS Donoven | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | MARTINEZ Kenneth | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | MARTINEZ Gabriel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | ||
| 28 | TUCKER David | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | MIZRAHI Meir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | MAZZA Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 31 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | MENON Rahul | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | HART Justin | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | HAM Ian | 100% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | NGUYEN DUY HONG Tom | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LEE Scott | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 38 | NWOBI Mezu | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 39 | COLANERI Trevor | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 40 | GREVERT Kaden | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.