Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | IYER Neil | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
2 | CHAN Elliott | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
3 | WU Yiyang | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
3 | GU Kevin | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
5 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
6 | VEDRE Neil | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
7 | FAN Hsiao-Kai(Kai) | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
8 | LEE Brandon | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
9 | SUNG Julian | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
10 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
11 | SINGHAL Armaan | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
12 | ROH Jaden | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
13 | CHEN Shawn | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
14 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
15 | VOSPER James | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
16 | ARNECKE Adam | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
17 | ZHONG Meng | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
18 | LIAO Yifong | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
19 | HONG Arick | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
20 | LE Long | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
21 | WANG HongXi | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
22 | COBIAN Richard | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
23 | KIM Enoch | 44% | 39% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | SANCHEZ William | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
26 | ZHONG Xuan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
27 | HENRY Ethan | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
28 | GARDNER David | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
29 | AN Chris (Siyoung) | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
30 | LIU Daniel | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | JAMBUSARIA Aum | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
32 | TSENG Kyle H. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | CHEN Yuan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
34 | HONG Aidan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
35 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
36 | OU Rigel | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | HWANG Jayden | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | LING Carson Jr | - | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
39 | FISCHER Noel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
40 | BODMER Erik | 26% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
40 | ZHENIROVSKYY Oleksandr | 6% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
42 | KULKARNI Shreyas | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.