Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Chenqiao | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
2 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 61% |
3 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
3 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
5 | LI Edison M. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
6 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | |
7 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 40% | 10% |
8 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 22% | |
9 | ZHOU Ryan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 30% | |
10 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
11 | BAE Eugene | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
12 | BIELER Mason | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 10% |
13 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
13 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
15 | ONG Nicholas | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
16 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 2% |
17 | YUE Jackson | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
18 | TSOI Spencer | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
19 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
20 | PE Noah | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
21 | LI Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
22 | SEIGEL Duncan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
23 | JACOB Ezra | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
24 | PARK William | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
25 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
26 | WEI Winston | 1% | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
27 | FOY Grant | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
28 | CHOI Colin | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
29 | GUO Austin | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
31 | GORDON William L. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
32 | ZHAN Kevin | - | 6% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
33 | YANG Charles | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
34 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
35 | WANG sicheng | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
36 | ANDRADE Cedric | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
36 | LEE Christopher | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
38 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 4% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
39 | ZHANG Andrew | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
40 | HUANG Nathan | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
41 | ZHANG Jayden | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
41 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
43 | BORG Matthew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 5% |
44 | BI Ryan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% |
45 | KARPMAN Benny | 9% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
46 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
47 | YUNG Brandon | 1% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
48 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
49 | PETROV Mikhail | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
50 | CHOI Ethan | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
50 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
52 | YANG Steve | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
53 | CHEN kenneth | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
54 | ZHANG Yankai | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
55 | TANG Brayden | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
56 | YEE Colin | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
57 | LI Austin | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
58 | GUO Joey | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
59 | TRAN Matthew | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | HE Ian | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | BRADY Benjamin | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
63 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
64 | MURDOCK Koichi | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
65 | DANIEL Nikith | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - | - |
66 | LI Jake | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
67 | YANG Aaron | 36% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
68 | DACKO Nolan | - | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
69 | ARCARA Evan | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
70 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
70 | CHEUNG Henry | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
72 | SHAW Eames | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
73 | TONEF Christian | 42% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
74 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
75 | LE Oliver | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
76 | WARD MADS | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
77 | JEREZ PINE Luca | 3% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
78 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.