Main Hall Dallas Market Center - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% |
| 2 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 50% |
| 3 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 3 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 28% | |
| 5 | LAI Miranda | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
| 6 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 51% | 23% |
| 7 | HU Sophie | - | - | 2% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 17% |
| 8 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 9 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 10 | BROWN Lola | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
| 11 | SOE Hayleigh | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 12 | LI Christina | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 13 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 14 | LI Olivia | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 16 | WEN Cynthia | 7% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% |
| 18 | CHAN Ella | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 51% | 22% |
| 19 | PECK Madeleine | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 20 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% |
| 21 | KASHUBA Mila | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 2% | 25% | 55% | 19% | |
| 23 | PARK Zena | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 58% | |
| 23 | WATSON Evelyn | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | |
| 25 | NWODO Naila | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% | |
| 26 | SHEN Gloria | - | 1% | 10% | 53% | 32% | 4% | |
| 27 | KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 51% | 9% |
| 29 | LEE Jeemin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 30 | JIN Jada Y | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 31 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 33 | RUI Jessie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 34 | HOM Avery | - | - | 1% | 11% | 49% | 34% | 6% |
| 35 | ZHANG Queeny | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | HO Peyton | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | RIVERA Leahy | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 39 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 40 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% | |
| 41 | GOITIA Genevieve | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 42 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 51% | 16% |
| 43 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KIM Ines | 3% | 23% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KOU Elisha | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 47 | CHO Olivia | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
| 48 | ZHU Alivia | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 49 | MALIK Manha | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | THOTA Akira | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 51 | CHENG Audrey | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | LIN Avery | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | DUVVA Sanika | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | MURPHY Genevieve | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 56 | MA Sophia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 57 | YANG Ava | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | BROWN Katelyn | 7% | 47% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HUANG Rosalyn | 13% | 48% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LU Keeva | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 61 | PHAN Logan | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 62 | LI Annabelle | 1% | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | ZHENG Annalyn | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 64 | FAN Melody | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 66 | FENG Christy | 4% | 25% | 47% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | KHETPAL Aalia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 68 | HAFEZ Sahar | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 69 | KIM Lauren | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 70 | BELL Blake | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | TANG Clementine | 23% | 49% | 25% | 2% | - | - | |
| 72 | SMOLICH Emily | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 73 | LIU Bella | - | 7% | 33% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | FENG Claire | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 75 | HWANG Carolina | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | YANG Ana | 11% | 41% | 41% | 6% | - | - | |
| 77 | KIM Lael | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 78 | KOESTERS Florentine | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 79 | LUO lucy | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 80 | DING Jennifer | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 81 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 82 | CHEN Aimee | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 85 | ZHANG Annabelle | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | YOUN Davina | 1% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 87 | LOTURCO Annabella | 24% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 88 | CHA Chloe | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | TORNBERG Reagan | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 90 | HOM Emma | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 90 | KIM Audrey | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | KRISHNAN Maya | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 93 | CRAWFORD Brynn | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 94 | CLOUD Chrystie | 38% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | WU Jennifer | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 96 | HINDMAN Grace | 37% | 47% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 97 | KARTHIK Advika | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 98 | TEOH Kaylee | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 99 | XIE Angela | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.