North Texas Roundup SYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, August 31, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Main Hall Dallas Market Center - Dallas, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) - - - - 5% 30% 64%
2 CAO Donald - - - 1% 7% 36% 56%
3 WANG Alex - - 3% 19% 46% 31%
3 YU BOWEN - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
5 MIAO Heqi - - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
6 YI Andrew - - - 4% 20% 42% 34%
7 SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan - - 5% 25% 44% 26%
8 HU Harry - - 4% 22% 46% 27%
9 BOSITA Brennan - - 3% 24% 51% 22%
9 SHAPIRO Leo - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13%
11 YU Ian - - 2% 13% 37% 39% 9%
12 SRIVATS Vedh - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
13 SLAVNOV Anton - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
13 DAI Zihou - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
15 HENRY Cadel - - 4% 23% 46% 27%
16 KUANG Cyrus 4% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
17 ZALETAEV Jacob 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
18 KOREN George - - 2% 9% 28% 40% 21%
19 WANG Luke - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
20 KOREN David 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
21 WONG Ron - - 4% 25% 46% 24%
22 LIM JUWANA Maximilian - 1% 10% 35% 40% 14%
23 KOZLOV Lucas - - 1% 9% 42% 48%
24 LAU Kyrus - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
25 WANG Yongen - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
26 ZHANG Aiden - 5% 21% 35% 28% 9% 1%
26 GUO Jonathan 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
28 LYU Tyler 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7% 1%
29 HUANG Anthony 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
30 CAO HAOTIAN - 2% 12% 31% 36% 16% 2%
31 KONDOGI Saivarun 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
32 BI JIAJUN - < 1% 3% 16% 36% 36% 9%
33 MELE Gianni - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 17%
34 WU Vincent - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
35 BROOKS Isaac 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
36 ARESERY Daniel - 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
37 STOLCKE Julian - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
38 TITOV Zachary - 2% 16% 50% 28% 4%
39 ZHANG Caleb 1% 15% 44% 31% 8% 1%
40 SONG Aidan - 1% 11% 35% 39% 13%
41 FAVO Christopher 2% 14% 36% 34% 13% 2%
42 CHEN Leo - 2% 19% 43% 29% 6%
43 O'KEEFE Brody 1% 12% 35% 37% 13% 1%
44 SRA Nawab 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
45 LAN Jasper 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
46 LIU Jayden - 1% 8% 30% 40% 18% 2%
47 YUEN Caleb - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
48 BROOKS Theo - 3% 13% 29% 33% 19% 4%
49 KOHLER Vaughn 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 3% -
50 PARK Jayden 1% 12% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
51 DEGUZMAN Holden 11% 33% 35% 16% 3% - -
52 CAI Limo 40% 41% 16% 3% - -
53 KANG Nathan 24% 48% 25% 3% - -
54 PARIKH Saavn 1% 11% 29% 34% 20% 5% 1%
55 LU Simon - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
56 MAKLIN David 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
57 HUANG Keon 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
58 KANG Jayden 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
59 KURIPKO Roman 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
60 DUFF Michael 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1%
61 YU Hyunseung 22% 44% 27% 6% 1% -
62 YANG Justin - 2% 12% 28% 34% 20% 4%
63 LIU Dylan 10% 30% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
64 EDELBROCK Beckett 25% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -
65 GILBERT Ari - 5% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
66 VIDREVICH David - 1% 7% 22% 37% 27% 6%
67 KORIVI Ishan 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
68 CHAVAN Aditya - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1%
69 KAMURA Kosei 1% 8% 26% 36% 22% 6% -
70 SHEN Alaric 10% 35% 39% 14% 2% -
71 BURLA Saiavaneesh 28% 45% 23% 4% - -
72 SCOTT Clark 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
73 SHANKAR Rahm 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% 1%
74 OH Caleb 2% 18% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
75 SHI Caleb 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
76 SMITH Etienne 2% 16% 39% 32% 10% 1% -
77 BALAGOPAL Aditya 11% 43% 34% 10% 1% - -
78 NUTHALAPATII Rishi 22% 43% 27% 6% 1% -
79 RIMMELE Sven Yan 22% 44% 28% 6% 1% -
79 CHOI Clayton 13% 42% 37% 8% - -
81 LIU Andy 9% 52% 32% 6% - -
82 SALMAN Ibrahim 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 6% -
83 CHEN Harrison 38% 41% 17% 4% - - -
84 ATA Kevin 3% 19% 40% 30% 8% 1%
85 SAMPAT Arjun 1% 14% 40% 33% 10% 1%
86 SHI Mark 25% 46% 25% 4% - -
87 RANGEL SANTANA Diego 67% 28% 5% - - - -
88 STYS Owen 3% 16% 32% 31% 14% 3% -
89 JAIN Aarambh 51% 37% 10% 1% - - -
89 RAHMAN Noah 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
91 STARLING Herbert 74% 24% 2% - - -
92 BENAVIDES Leo 1% 26% 43% 24% 5% 1% -
92 MILLER Graham 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.