Main Hall Dallas Market Center - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
2 | QIAN Irvine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
3 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
3 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
5 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
6 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
7 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
8 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 18% | |
9 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
10 | LI Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
11 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
12 | DECKER Hunter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
13 | CAMPOS Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
14 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
15 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
16 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
17 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
18 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
19 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
20 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | DINH Nam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
22 | SOOS Whitman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
23 | KIM Leejay | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
24 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | VAN RIET Stefan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
26 | TRACY James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
27 | MULDOON Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
28 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
29 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
30 | KIM Julian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
31 | MICU Constantin | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
32 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
34 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
35 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
36 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
37 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
38 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
38 | HUANG Ethan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
38 | MIKHAIL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
41 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
42 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
43 | COHEN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
44 | KIM Doyun | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
45 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
46 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
47 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
48 | ZHAN ETHAN | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
49 | SABAH Alan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
50 | GONZALEZ Kian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
51 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
52 | RODRIGUEZ Alejandro | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | SATHYAN Dev | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
54 | YANG Junhu | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | SMALL slater | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
56 | MODI Rohan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | TREVINO Lucas | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
59 | SUYAMA Ryuki | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
62 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.