Main Hall Dallas Market Center - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Albert | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 5 | KROPP Wesley | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 6 | KIM Gene | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 7 | GOODMAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 8 | CAFASSO Alexander | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | LI Tristan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 10 | QIAN Irvine | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 11 | CHANEY Charles | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 12 | CHEN Tianjun | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 14 | WU MiEr | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | CHEN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 16 | KIM Doyun | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MULDOON Thomas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 18 | DECKER Hunter | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 19 | GONZALEZ Kian | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 20 | SOOS Whitman | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 21 | SHIM Jae | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 22 | MODI Rohan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 23 | TANG Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | KIM Leejay | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LEE Leo | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | FEELY Benjamin | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | VAN RIET Stefan | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | QU RuiTing | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | CHANG Matthew | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | CHO Joshua | 17% | 45% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | HUANG Ethan | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | IBANEZ Benjamin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 34 | ZHOU Max | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | BRESLAV Asher | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | TSIEN Richard | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 37 | OLSON Joseph | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | SATHYAN Dev | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 39 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | TUMULA Arihaan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | YAO Tristan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ZHENG Jason | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 43 | CHO Adrian | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHAI Junqi | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 45 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | MICU Constantin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 47 | HUA Nolan | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | KIM Louie | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | LI Nathan | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | YANG Junhu | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 51 | KIM Alexander | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | WU Jiachen | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SMALL slater | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SUYAMA Ryuki | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Harrison | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 56 | CAMPOS Sebastian | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 57 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 58 | ZHAN ETHAN | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | DINH Nam | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | LIN Edison | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | DISPENZA Jayan | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.