Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EKSHTUT Leah | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 2 | LIU Chloe | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 3 | SONKU Mira | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | SUN Nicole | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | BURROWS Beatrice | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 6 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 7 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 8 | LAW Mila | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 9 | TIAN Victoria | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | YOUN Emily | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Flora | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | XI Emily | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | XU Mulan | 4% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | ZHU Una | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 15 | CHEN Laila | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 16 | CHEN Allison | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 17 | WU Evelyn | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | REDWINE Louise | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 20 | JIANG chenxi | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% | |
| 21 | ORDORICA Abra | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 22 | NIKOLLA Vivienne | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | CHO Josephine | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | POYNTON Cora | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 25 | CHEN Yudian | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | HENRYHANSON Violet | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 27 | CHEN Reina | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | XIE ANDREA | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 30 | SPRINGER Lily | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | DING Iris Siyue | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 32 | LI Kayla | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | PAN Emma | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | MISHIMA Olivia | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 35 | MCMAHON Julia | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | KANDHI Aryaa | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | SELASSIE Semara | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | YIN Elaine | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | LEE Iona | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | GARZON Laura | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHEN freya | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHI Evelyn | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | JIN Serena | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.