Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 2 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 3 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 47% | |
| 3 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% | ||
| 5 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 7 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 8 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 5% | 28% | 48% | 18% | |
| 9 | ZHU Audrey | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 10 | ZHANG Caroline | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 11 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | BO Iris | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 13 | GOODMAN Carden | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 2% | |
| 14 | LUO lucy | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 3% | |
| 15 | SHANG Arianna | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 1% |
| 16 | GE Deanna | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | - | ||
| 18 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | SHUTZER Lily | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | IWERSEN Marte | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 21 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 22 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | KOESTERS Florentine | 7% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | KIRBY Emelie | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | ||
| 25 | LEO Jenna | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 3% | |
| 26 | WANG Wenxi | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | ELLISON Ingrid | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | SUN Erin | 6% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 2% | ||
| 29 | HONG Mabel | 1% | 16% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 31 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 32 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BENNETT Emi | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | GENG Emma | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 35 | TEE Cymbeline | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | HUDSON Sophie | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | LIAW Audrey | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 1% | ||
| 39 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LU Sophia | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GONG Maggie | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | COMORA Elena | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 43 | IRWIN Juliet | 52% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | ZHU Alicia | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | CLOUD Chrystie | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.