Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOTOVA Masha | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 2 | LEE Kaitlin | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 3 | MULLER Inara | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | PARK Gabriella | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | ZONG Eliane | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 6 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 27% | |
| 7 | SMITH Genevieve | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 8 | FOSS Persephone | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 43% | 10% | |
| 9 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 10 | HILD Anya | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 11 | LEE Elise | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 12 | MENON Maya | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 13 | WILLER Anna | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 14 | KARAVAS Lucy | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 15 | JUN Sofia | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 17 | POTDAR Harper | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | MAGITSKY Giadora | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | PURITZ Morgan | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 20 | RIFKIN Talia | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 21 | SWAMINATHAN Keerthi | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | CHANG Grace | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | KANG Ellie | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | QUIROS Lucia | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | MUKHERJEE Simone | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.