Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
2 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
3 | DAZEY Jason T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
3 | MCNARY Sean | 100% | 95% | 64% | 20% | 2% |
5 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 7% |
6 | HAGGARD Dominic | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% |
7 | DEBACK Maximus (Max) X. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
8 | TARR Robert | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
9 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 7% |
10 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 4% |
11 | YANG Junhu | 100% | 44% | 8% | - | - |
12 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% |
13 | PETTIJOHN Luke | 100% | 92% | 56% | 14% | - |
14 | ZALPURI Zorin | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
15 | MCNARY Ross | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.