Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
2 | HABBOUB Qusai | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% | 1% |
3 | LIU William | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 44% | 2% |
3 | LI Richard Y. | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
5 | CHIANG Alex M. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 50% | 28% |
6 | PARK Sky | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 49% | 7% |
7 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
8 | GOFF Nathaniel | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
9 | PE Noah | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
10 | LEE Jayden J. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
11 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
12 | BARRETT Austin | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
13 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 1% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
14 | BAILEY William F. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 38% | 9% |
15 | SU Desmond | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
16 | LUK Trusten | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
17 | CHENG Mason | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
18 | KUZMAK Michael J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
19 | JAUME Andrei | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
20 | WANG sicheng | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
21 | HOLCOMB Alexander | 19% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
22 | SU Preston | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
23 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
24 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% | - |
25 | DARRICAU OLY Henri J. | < 1% | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
26 | VAGGALIS Denny | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | LESNIAK Chuck | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | HOLCOMB Michael | 80% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.