Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
2 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
3 | LI Christina | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
3 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
5 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
6 | PHAN Logan | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
6 | GENG Emma | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
8 | CHOI Cara | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
9 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
10 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
10 | HOU Xu | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
12 | KOESTERS Cecilie | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
13 | LIN Zhishan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
14 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
15 | CHAN Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
16 | PAEK Mila | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
17 | FAN Melody | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | < 1% |
18 | YOUM Amelia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
19 | BAULIN Zoya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 45% | 13% |
19 | HUDSON Sophie | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
22 | KOESTERS Florentine | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
23 | LU Sophia | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | BALIN Sophia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
25 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
26 | HEMPHILL Mia | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
27 | WU Charlotte | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
28 | CLOUD Chrystie | 2% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | TEE Cymbeline | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | KIM Lael | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
31 | JIN Emily | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | ZHU Alicia | 17% | 45% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | LOBO Sophie | 9% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
34 | GOMEZ Amelia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
35 | PAEK Ellie | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | VO Evelyn | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
37 | LIANG Jasmine | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
38 | SEO Celine | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | DAVIS Gabriella | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | BROWN Katelyn | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | WEINER Charlotte | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.