Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
| 3 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 5 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 7 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | |
| 8 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 9 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 10 | WEI William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 12 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 14 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 15 | PARK Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 16 | BIVIJI Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 17 | BAHK Caleb | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 18 | JI Johnson | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 19 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 2% |
| 20 | AROUNA Ilan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | YU Zhexuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 23 | SO Morgan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | MOHAMED Moaz | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 30 | EKONG-REID Severian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 32 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | COPP Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | - |
| 35 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 36 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 98% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | COBITZ Harrison | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | YANG Byron | 100% | 88% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | JARAMILLO Juan | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | NG Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | MARTINEZ Luke | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | NAYAK Surin K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | JARRETT Benjamin | 100% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HOUSER Johnathan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 53 | RIOS Alexander | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | PATEL Kiran | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BERGHAUSER Zachary | 100% | 67% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.