Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOLZHENKO Bogdan | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 31% |
| 2 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | - |
| 3 | AGARWAL Savya | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 3 | CHEN Owen | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 5% | |
| 5 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
| 6 | HE Ian | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 32% | 3% | |
| 7 | MA Isabelle | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
| 8 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 9 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 10 | LI Chelsea | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Matthew | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 10% | |
| 12 | CHEN Jinyu | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | BURLINGAME Owen | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | SAFTA Aidan | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 2% | |
| 15 | ASSAO Neil | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LAVERY Lucy | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | CHETWANI naman | 2% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | NGUYEN VAN Constantin | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | MASOOD Rohail | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | DO Justin | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 21 | YU Zen | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 4% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | LEE Abigail | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | CHENG Maxwell | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | RAJU Avinash | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.