Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LIM William J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | RAJA Arnav | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | FRIAS Saul F. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
3 | ANDRES Michael | V D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
5 | LEE Noah | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | JOO Jeein | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | HWANG Jayden | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | ZUBATIY Samuel | D V D V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
9 | WONG Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
10 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
11 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | HOLZ Lucas | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | CHENEY Christopher (Chris) M. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
14 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
15 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | V V D V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
16 | HENRY Ethan | D D D V V | V V V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
17 | QIU Nathan | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
17 | YANG Dylan | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
19 | IM Tyler | V V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
20 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
21 | LI Yiwei | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | RAMANAN Govind | V D V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
23 | POFF Kainoa | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
24 | SO Hananiah | V D V V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
25 | GREMILLION Obadiah | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
26 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | D V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
27 | AURAY Phileas | D D V V D V | V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
28 | TANI Tino | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
29 | HO Anson | D D V V V D | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
29 | LI Ayden | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
31 | MUNGUIA Nathan | V D V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
32 | SU Kingston | V D D V D V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
33 | KANG Evan | V V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
34 | ERMAKOV Semeon | D V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | WONG David | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
36 | WANG Samuel | V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
37 | BARRIOS Diego | D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
38 | TAO Jeffrey | D D V V V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
39 | LEE Brian | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
40 | KANG Matthew | D V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | YANG Phillip | V V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
42 | GARDNER David | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
43 | MINASIAN Mason | V D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
44 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | V V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
45 | ZEYU wu | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
46 | CHAN Henry | D D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
47 | SINGHAL Armaan | D V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
48 | NOBLE Daniel | D D V V V D | V D | 5.3 | 3 | -2.3 |
49 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | V V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
50 | MANDEL Adam J. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
51 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | V D D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
51 | LI Yidong A. | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
53 | WESLER Logan A. | D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
54 | VEDRE Neil | V D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | IYER Neil | V D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
56 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | D V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
57 | VO Landon | D V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
58 | GATTO Enzo P. | D D D V V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
59 | LI Leo | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
60 | CAO Donald | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
61 | RADJABLI Maximillian | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
62 | BROWN Andrew | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | XIAO Brayden | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
64 | KULKARNI Shreyas | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
65 | CHAN Elliott | V V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
66 | ROSALES Vincent | V V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
67 | COBIAN Richard | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
68 | TENG Lucas | D V D D V | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
69 | LUC Linkin | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
70 | WANG HongXi | D V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | KWON Kenneth | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
72 | HWANG Hagan | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
73 | CHI Everett | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
74 | CHEN Cooper | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
75 | BEAM David E. | D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
76 | BERENHOLZ Jared G. | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
77 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
78 | LIU Daniel | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
79 | WU Yiyang | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
80 | ZHANG KAIQI | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | ZHANG Kaixuan | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
82 | LIU Yijin | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
83 | SRIVATSAV Anay | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
84 | LEE Brandon | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
85 | BRUM Charles E. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
86 | TSENG Kyle H. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
86 | LIANG David | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.