Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 30% | |
| 2 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% |
| 3 | XU Jessica | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 5 | SUN Hanya | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 6 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 7 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 8 | WANG Jessie | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
| 9 | MOLLINIER Angel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 10 | FU Shannon | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 12 | MAI Mailan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 13 | LIN Laura | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 14 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | - | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 16 | XU Amy(Chenyu) | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | MENDOZA Zoie | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 18 | BROWN Riley | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | DALEY Keira | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
| 20 | KROTZ Gemma | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | HERNASA Anna | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 22 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 23 | SHETTY Nandita | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | LEE Yeriel | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 25 | BUSH Emma | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 26 | BUCA Nora | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | MENG Fina | - | 6% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GAGARING Genia | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Camilla | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 30 | KANE Chloe | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 31 | SUN Karolyn | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | EYUNNI Vibha | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | BAUTISTA DE ROBLES Ekaterine | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | BURICEA Ada | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 35 | ROMO OSTOS Nubia Nahomi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 36 | LE Luana | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | RADOV Una | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HERD Angela | - | 3% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 39 | STEPHAN Ella Whitney | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | BLAETZ Isadora | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 41 | YUMIACO Nylah | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | BUDMAN Ava | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | MANDAP Alessandra | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | CHEONG Chloe | - | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | ZHAO Yanning | 5% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | XIE Yuyan | 5% | 44% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | XU Emily (Hua) | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | UEMURA Lyllia | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | HASIM Eurietta | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | ALI Maryum | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | WANG Lihong | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 52 | LIN Isabel | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 53 | PAK Ella | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | FEHER Francesca | 50% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | TRUONG Audrey | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | ALI Zoya | 31% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | MISRA Tara | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.