Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | DODRILL Grant | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | LEONARD Cole | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | GILMORE Thomas W. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | ZHOU Kevin | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | SIMAK Joseph P. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 9 | WOODWARD Connor | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | CHIN Matthew W. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ETIN Ari | D V V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 13 | GHENEA George Philipe | V D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 14 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | D D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | CHEN Brian | D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 16 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | V D V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 17 | PAN Andrew W. | D V D V V V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 18 | CHAVES Matthew J. | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | LU Caleb Q. | D V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | MEHTA Krish | V V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | COSGROVE Connor R. | V V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 23 | FORT David | D D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 24 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | BAERMAN Michael | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | HONG Steven | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | GAO Andrew | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 28 | HOLDEN Joseph | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | RENGER Felipe | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | DYSART-CHAPPELL Evan | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | BERRIO Carter E. | D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 32 | DESHETLER Scott | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | COX Luis E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 34 | WANG Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.