Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BALE ATMAN | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | BIVIJI Ali | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 3 | SADHU Neiyam | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | MELE Gianni | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | PARK Inwoo | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | LUCAS William | D V V V D D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | AGARWAAL Yohan | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | MOHAMED Moaz | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | WEI William | V D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | KARAVAS Nicholas | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | LI Michael | D V D V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 15 | LAU Kyrus | D D V D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | DAI Zihou | D D D V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 17 | LEVIN Jacob | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 18 | SWIFT Owen | V V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 19 | TRZEPLA Max | V V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 20 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | V V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 21 | NG Jonathan | V V V D V D | D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
| 22 | NELSON Micah | V D D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | EKONG-REID Severian | D V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | ZWAKA Jonas | V D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | FIROOZI Sam | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | KURIYAMA Marcus | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 27 | NAYAGAM Nishant | V D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | BIVIJI Adam | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 29 | KIARA Kinoti | D D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | AVERY Marcus | D V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | DOSTAL Maximilian | D V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | PATEL Kiran | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | LEE Korbon | D D V V V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 34 | KENNEDY Tomás | D D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 35 | MATTOO Dhruv | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | LIU Ryan | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | HELD Lev | V D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 38 | FENG Brendan | V D D V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 39 | SUBA Mason | V D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 40 | SONG Ryan | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 41 | SHAPIRO Leo | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | STEWART Samuel | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 43 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 44 | KULKARNI Ishir | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | PARROCO Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 46 | WU Vincent | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 47 | JARRETT Benjamin | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | SOCHNIKOV Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 49 | KONJENGBAM Neo | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.