Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DANNULL Lukas J. | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 2 | ESCUETA Tony V. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SMITH David C. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | HAMMER Peter A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 7 | LEONARD Cole | D D D V V | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 8 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | D D D D D V | V V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 9 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 10 | CHIN Matthew W. | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | HUSSAIN Faaris | V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | DANNULL Linus N. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | TONG ZACHARY | V V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | ZHOU Justin | V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | GILMORE Thomas W. | D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | BERRIO Carter E. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 17 | DODRILL Grant | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | CHEN Brian | V D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 19 | HENSHAW Joseph | V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 21 | ZHOU Kevin | V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | V D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | CHANG Eliot A. | D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | PARK Collin D. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 27 | SIMAK Joseph P. | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | PAN Andrew W. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | COX Luis E. | D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | CHAVES Matthew J. | D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | LU Caleb Q. | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | GHENEA George Philipe | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | JIANG Kevin | D D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 35 | COSGROVE Connor R. | D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | FORT David | D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | WRIGHT Athan | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 38 | WOODWARD Connor | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 39 | DESHETLER Scott | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 40 | GAO Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 41 | HOLDEN Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 42 | RENGER Felipe | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.