Fencing Academy of Denver - Littleton, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STRZALKOWSKI Ola | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
2 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
3 | MARTURANO Bridget | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
3 | MENDOZA Christian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 38% | 41% | 4% |
5 | ZOLLER Matt | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
6 | BRUSHABER Colin | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 2% | - |
7 | KRASOWITZ Jason | - | - | - | 2% | 30% | 51% | 18% |
8 | FIEDLER Kevin | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | - |
9 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
10 | MIGHELL Jason | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
11 | ROJAS Alejandro Joaquin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
12 | BEVANS Auden | - | 8% | 35% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
13 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
14 | ZOLLER Noelle | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
15 | ROBINSON Ezra | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
16 | WILLIAMS Quincey | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% | |
17 | BUHAY Kirsten | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
18 | STRONG Joshua | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
19 | HUANG Jasper | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
20 | CHERSKOV Annie | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
21 | KIM Connor | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
22 | CHATTABOINA Haveesh | 24% | 50% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
23 | FEITLER Sarah | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
24 | EZZELL Alexander | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | VINOGOROVA Daria | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | MERRITT Gregory | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
27 | CAMPBELL Torin | 3% | 26% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.