Event Results
WWD Observational Tournament and Cookie ChallengeDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SONG Ethan | D V V V D | V V V V | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 2 | KARPEYCHIK Mark | V D D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 3 | INAMTI Anaya | D V D V D | V V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 3 | CHEN Sammy | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 5 | SRIVASTAVA Aditya | V V V V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
| 6 | ESPARZA-CHEN Lucien | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | WANG Ethan | V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 8 | HOPKINS Samuel | V D V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 | |
| 9 | LIN James | D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 10 | NAKRA Amelia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | GERSHAFT William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | CHEN Jimmy | D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 13 | TERPSMA Penelope | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |