Tiger Open 2025

Senior Mixed Foil

Saturday, September 27, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FEDELI Francesco 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 69% 16%
2 MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 5%
3 DUBE Ian D. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 9%
3 FLYNN Oliver 100% 99% 84% 46% 13% 2% -
5 DING Tommy 100% 100% 100% 96% 62% 11%
6 CAMPBELL Justin 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
7 SHEHORN Connor 100% 100% 99% 87% 52% 13%
8 STEFKO Ryan 100% 100% 94% 66% 24% 3%
9 FULMER Jacob 100% 100% 99% 88% 59% 22% 3%
10 DUERSON Lauren 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 11%
11 WANDEL Ethan S. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 36%
12 SHULER Alden 100% 94% 65% 27% 6% 1% -
13 OH Seonghun 100% 100% 93% 68% 30% 6% -
14 COLLINS Andrew M. 100% 100% 93% 64% 24% 4%
15 WANG Thea 100% 100% 85% 48% 14% 2%
16 MONSCH Channing 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 10% 1%
17 HOANG Ethan 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 30%
18 SHIEH Kiley 100% 97% 72% 28% 3% -
19 ALLEN Charles 100% 100% 96% 77% 38% 7% -
20 COLLETTE Tobias 100% 95% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
21 ZALINSKY Brandon W. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 10%
22 SCOTT Ford 100% 99% 78% 34% 6% - -
23 GRUNER Aidan 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
24 PUTNAM Nicholas 100% 46% 8% - - -
25 RUSSELL grant 100% 64% 19% 3% - -
26 CARDINAL Elise 100% 72% 30% 7% 1% - -
27 KADRIC Max 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
28 JONES Jacob 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 2% -
29 REMINGTON Brennan 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
30 MAYER Abbey 100% 98% 81% 40% 7% -
31 FISHER Natalie 100% 49% 11% 1% - - -
32 JACKSON Julia 100% 65% 12% 1% - -
33 LIN Edison 100% 61% 19% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.