Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HICKS Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | |
| 2 | NAMIREDDY Ruthvik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
| 3 | IBANEZ Julien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 5 | FERRARO Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 6 | DECKER Carlton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
| 7 | THOMPSON Conner | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 8 | LABROZZI Quinn | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% | |
| 10 | KINSELLA John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 11 | MEIER Nicholas M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 12 | PATEL Divyam | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | PELLI Madeleine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 14 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 15 | ASBY Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 16 | BISEN Aryaman | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 17 | CATES Georgia | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | HAGEN Samuel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | MACLEOD Zion | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 20 | BASS Jackson | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 21 | CHAMALA Satvik | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | ROHDE Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | HICKS Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | KRISHNAKUMAR Trisha | 100% | 85% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 26 | STEELE Jeff | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | KOTERBA Chris | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | |
| 28 | ARMES Maggie | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | OLENDER Lexi | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | SANTIAGO Aurelio | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 32 | LOWE Michael | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | NEWTON Tal | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 34 | SONG Vivian | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | SEARS SARAH | 100% | 85% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BILLINGSLEA Owen | 100% | 88% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | FRANKUM Nate | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.