Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Hall C - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
2 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 50% |
3 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | |
3 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
5 | ROJAS Elijah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
6 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% | |
7 | ALLEN DJ | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
8 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
9 | POPESCU Tudor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
10 | PIERCE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
11 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
12 | WANG Xicheng | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - | - |
13 | AMEND Jake | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
14 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
15 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
16 | KWON Chase | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | LARGAESPADA LUIS V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 28% |
18 | BHATT Jayan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
19 | OH Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
20 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
21 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 11% | 1% |
22 | SCHEURER Edwin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | KRECKE Gareth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
24 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | 2% | - |
25 | RASK Galen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
26 | WARD Evan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | |
27 | D'ALONZO Jake | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | |
28 | ELSAYED Ahmed | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
29 | SIELSKI Evan | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
30 | PEREZ Logan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
31 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
32 | COPENHAVER Edward | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% | |
34 | LIN Evan | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
35 | ROZENBLIT Nick | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
36 | LA BARR Edward T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
37 | SCIARROTTA Andy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
38 | STRAYER Cody | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
39 | ALABI Adriel | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | RIVERA Ernest | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.