Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% |
| 2 | LI Tiffany | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 3 | WANG MONA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 5 | KATZ Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 6 | SUN Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 7 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
| 8 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 10 | YANG Selina | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 11 | PEREIRA Izumi | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 1% |
| 13 | TASSONE Charlie | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LIU Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 16 | WANG Emily | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | PARK Gabriella | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 18 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 16% |
| 19 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | WANG Selina | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JAJRA Avni | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | ALMEDA Galina | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 23 | GOODWIN Julia | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 24 | MOTOVA Masha | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | HUANG Zoe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | GISCHLER Mila | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | YIN Xizi | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PHILLIPPY Hannah | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | DELELLIS-TALOMIE Rae | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | AN Jamie | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KIM Jodie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | LIU Teresa | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | WANG Keira | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | MADDES Alexa | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.