The UT-Austin Student Rec Center - AUSTIN, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HURME Tommi K. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
2 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
3 | FRENCH Timothy | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
3 | KRAMER Jack P. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
5 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | - | 1% | 17% | 57% | 26% |
6 | ZUBECK Dominic | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
7 | LIM Robert | - | 2% | 20% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
8 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 55% |
9 | TIEMANN Landen | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 8% |
10 | KASKAN Peter E. | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 33% | 3% |
11 | JAUME Andrei | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
12 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | - |
12 | MA Benjamin | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
14 | WOODALL Ian L. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 39% | 4% |
15 | HUANG Selina | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
16 | NGUYEN Wolfie (Khanh) | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | WELDON Marten | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
18 | SABAH Alan | 11% | 41% | 40% | 8% | - | - |
19 | THOMAS Joshua | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - |
20 | QURESHI Shaheer | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | REHUREK Luke | 45% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
22 | AZIMI Ariana | 6% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 2% | - |
22 | NANCE Hogan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
24 | YOU Joyce | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
25 | ULRICH Jacob | 16% | 46% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
26 | OVERCASH II James (Coot) C. | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
27 | WILSON Kat | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | VIEN Brian | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
29 | FRENCH Drake | 43% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
29 | VASHISHTH Adi | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.