Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LEE Christopher T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
2 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
3 | BAILEY William F. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
3 | HOWLAND Jonas | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
5 | SENIC Lucas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
6 | WONG Evan | V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
7 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
8 | FANG Haoyu | V D D D D | V V V V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
9 | GUTH Joseph | V V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
10 | KIM Aiden | V V V V V D | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
11 | CHAN Matthew | D V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
12 | MCISAAC Finn | V V V D V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
13 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | V V D V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
14 | CHUANG Oscar | V V V D D | V V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
15 | LEUNG Ethan | D D V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
16 | XU Dinghui Ryan | D V V D D V | V V V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
17 | MORA Johan | V V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
18 | LEE Benjamin H. | V V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
19 | TOEWS Jackson | V V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
20 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | V V V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
21 | VANOYEN Dominick | V V D V V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
22 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | V V V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
23 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
24 | ARATA Connor | V V V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
25 | HICKEY Connor | V V V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
26 | ZHANG Jacob | V V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
27 | SOYSKI Harrison Q. | V V D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
27 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | V V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
29 | GE Felix Fei | V V V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
30 | ZINSER James | D V D V V V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
31 | RUBY Asher | V D V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
32 | LI Andy | V D V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
33 | ZHENG Marcus | V V V V V V | D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
34 | MAVANI Krishna | V V D V V V | D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
35 | KATWAN Adam A. | V D V D V V | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
36 | LU Alex | V D V V V D | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
37 | HEYBOER Jason | V V V D V D | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
38 | MILLER Douglas S. | V D V V D V | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
39 | HONG Derek | D V V V D V | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
40 | CAO Leon M. | D V V D V V | D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
41 | SHI Boris | V V D V D D | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
42 | GNEUHS Sam | D V D D V V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
43 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
44 | MARTIN William | V D V V D D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
45 | NAIDL Josiah | V D D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
46 | RONE Tosan | D D V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
47 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | D D V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
48 | HERRERA Xavier | D V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
49 | MCCONKEY Tristan | V D V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
50 | FLANAGAN James | D V D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
51 | TAN Xinlai | D D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
52 | SINHA Verdhaan | D V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
53 | DAVIS Benjamin | V D D D V | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
54 | WILEY Conor | D V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
55 | KUE Temujin | V D D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
56 | DURHAM Porter | V D V D D D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
56 | KAGAN Noah | D D D D V V | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
58 | KABARITI Karim | V D D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
59 | STORER Alexander | D V D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
60 | DELL George H. | D D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
61 | MCCONKEY Eric | D D V D D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
62 | ZMUDA Aiden | D D V D D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
62 | LINEBERRY CADEN | D D D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
62 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | D D D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
65 | SMITH Erick | V D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
66 | DECKER Evan M. | V D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
67 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
68 | TIAN Nicolas | D V D D D V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
69 | SYMMANK Callen | D D D V V D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
70 | NAIDL Micah | D D V D D V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
71 | FEEHAN Conor | D D V D D V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
72 | IBARRA Alejandro | D D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
73 | MARTIN Dexter | D D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
74 | KIM Ethen | D V D D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
75 | CRUZ Ben | D D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
76 | CRONK Trevor | D D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
77 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | D D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
78 | HEUER Weston | D D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
79 | LEE Hans | D D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
80 | ZHANG Hanson | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
81 | LEYLAND John | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
82 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
83 | CHAN William | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
84 | DAVIS Jace W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
84 | VAGGALIS Denny | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
84 | KTSANES Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
84 | MISIOURA Mark | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
88 | HAGLER Alexziah | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
89 | PFISTER Cameron | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.