San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 2 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 3 | CUI Alivia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 5% | |
| 6 | SINGH Ashni | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 7 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 20% | |
| 8 | OH Ceana | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CHU Camille | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 3% | |
| 10 | COX Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 30% | |
| 11 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 12 | DHARWADKAR Era | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 13 | GILLIS-PADE Aya | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | KWON Genevie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | DHARWADKAR Ovee | 100% | 84% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 16 | REN Kayley | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | LEE Roselyn | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.