San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% |
3 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
3 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
5 | DU Angela | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 5% | |
6 | GALLON Maya S. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
7 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% | - |
8 | PACHECO Naomi | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
9 | SAID Riana | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
10 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 51% | 15% |
11 | HSU Adele Y. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
12 | YIN Grace | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
13 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
14 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
15 | HUANG audrey | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | |
16 | DUONG Zoey | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
17 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
18 | PACHECO Evangeline | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
19 | DALEY Keira | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
20 | ADUSUMILLI Rishitha | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
21 | LI Charlotte | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 3% | |
22 | GUPTA Sanya | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
23 | LOUIE Sarah | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
24 | WANG Grace | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
25 | LIN Ashley | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | SAHI Jaya Emma | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
27 | UMMETHALA Kavya | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.