Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 2% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
| 2 | CHUANG Oscar | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
| 3 | KIM Aiden | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 35% | 6% |
| 5 | LU Alex | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% |
| 6 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 7 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 73% | |
| 8 | TOEWS Jackson | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% | |
| 9 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% |
| 10 | KUE Temujin | - | - | 2% | 21% | 49% | 29% | |
| 11 | FANG Haoyu | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
| 12 | NAIDL Josiah | - | - | 9% | 36% | 40% | 14% | |
| 13 | ARATA Connor | - | - | 4% | 33% | 46% | 17% | |
| 14 | HEYBOER Jason | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 40% | 6% | |
| 15 | SHI Boris | 1% | 10% | 45% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | ZHOU Justin | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | RUBY Asher | - | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 18 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% | |
| 19 | TAN Xinlai | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 47% | 14% |
| 20 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% |
| 21 | EDWARDS Connor | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 22 | HICKEY Connor | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 33% | |
| 23 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 3% | 29% | 47% | 21% | |
| 24 | ZINSER James | - | 4% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | WILEY Conor | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | WEBSTER Liam | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | GE Felix Fei | - | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 19% | |
| 28 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHAO Jason | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | DAVIS Benjamin | - | 3% | 23% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HERRERA Xavier | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | TIAN Nicolas | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 51% | 16% |
| 34 | ZMUDA Aiden | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | MAVANI Krishna | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 38% | 7% | |
| 36 | HONG Derek | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 35% | 8% | |
| 37 | IBARRA Alejandro | 4% | 53% | 39% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | LI Andy | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | WANG Freyr | 7% | 35% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SYMMANK Callen | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | NAIDL Micah | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WENGER Rowan | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 43 | DEPP Edward | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | KAGAN Noah | 1% | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | KIM Ethen | 23% | 51% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 41% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | FEEHAN Conor | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 1% | 32% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | NUSS Thomas | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | WENGER Liam | 1% | 9% | 43% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 51 | DAVIS Jace W. | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | NG Gavin | 53% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | CHAN William | 34% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | MOGENSEN Ezra | 30% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | NOWICKI William | 10% | 40% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CRONK Trevor | 20% | 50% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 49% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | NI Aaric | 3% | 25% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | ROBINSON Ezekiel | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | XU Rambert | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 61 | WINTERS Linus | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 62 | PFISTER Cameron | 63% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | BEDARD Bennett | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KOTCH Brodie | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.