Academy of Fencing Masters - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
2 | KHAYAT Ziad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% |
3 | LUCENAY Jean Michel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% |
3 | BAUMERT David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
5 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | 1% |
6 | GALLAGHER PELLETIER Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
7 | MAYA Vivien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
8 | CHU Ted | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
9 | TANG Mingyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
10 | PETROLL Jared | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 49% |
11 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
12 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 12% |
13 | HEINS Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | 1% |
14 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
15 | BOYCE Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 15% |
16 | GUO Luke | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
17 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
18 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% | |
19 | ELZAYN Hadi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 5% |
20 | OR Anson | 100% | 83% | 21% | 2% | < 1% | - | - |
21 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | - |
22 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | - |
23 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
24 | TANG Michael | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
25 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
26 | COHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
27 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
28 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
29 | NGUYEN Peyton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
30 | WONG Preston | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | |
32 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
33 | MARKOFF Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 7% | - | - |
34 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
36 | TRACY James | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
37 | FUNG Shaun | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
38 | XU Yanwen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% | - |
39 | GUO Woody | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
40 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | MITCHEM Paolo | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
42 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
43 | TAMHANE Sidhant | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
45 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
46 | ZU Jacqueline | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 89% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
48 | ZGAMA Oleksii | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
49 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
50 | ZHONG Louie | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
51 | QIAO James | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
52 | LIPTON Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - |
53 | ALI Zoya | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
54 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
55 | YOON Walter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
56 | KROTZ Gemma | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
57 | MOLLINIER TOUBLET Bertrand | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
58 | MOHABIR Ariane | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
59 | LI Sean | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | BECK Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 3% | - |
60 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.