Brentwood High School - Brentwood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAI Mailan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 2 | KANE Chloe | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 36% | 8% |
| 3 | SHERMAN Olivia | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 7% | |
| 3 | CHEONG Chloe | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 5% | |
| 5 | MANDAP Alessandra | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 6 | GRAZIANO Ruby Mae | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 7 | BLAETZ Isadora | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 8 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 5% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 9 | GAGARING Genia | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 10 | PAK Ella | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 11 | KIM Audrey | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 12 | GRAZIANO Josephine | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | LAY Apollonia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 14 | RIVERA Natalia | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 15 | SALAZAR Alanis | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 16 | JONES Sofía | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 17 | KHATCHADOURIAN Jacqueline | - | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 36% | |
| 18 | TEDFORD Bridget | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | LUCENA Yaretzi | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | CHENG Liwen | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | NOHAILE Maeve | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
| 22 | CHENG Yiwen | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | REYES QUEVEDO Carolina | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | GORDON Chloe | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | BROWN Leah | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 26 | BARDAKOS Katherine | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | LEEDS Maia | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | KENNEDY Skyler | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | TICK Sidonie | 1% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | - | |
| 30 | BUCASAS Lia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 31 | AMIR Olivia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 32 | STEMPEL Taylor | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | WEINBERG Milena | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | BERENJI Ava | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 19% | |
| 35 | GRACE Riley | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 36 | PERLAS Twila | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% |
| 37 | HORVATH Annabella | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 38 | ESPINOZA Miya | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | GOLDBERG Amelia | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | BOLES Leila | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | SUAREZ Grace | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SARKAR Kayla | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | OGLESBY-HALL Quinn | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | FLORES Patricia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 45 | FLORES Emma | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | DE PADUA Shandi Anne | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 47 | TAYLOR Ashlyn | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | HAN eul | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 49 | FOUSE LAWRENCE Asha | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | MONTIEL BARRERA Celine | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | MILLINER Cassidy | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | URIZAR Melina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | DANCE Lisa | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | LU Luna | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | DE BEAUBIEN Pressly | 2% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | FORERO Eliana | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 57 | PARRA-CHRISTIE Grace | 2% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.