Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BIELER Mason | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 2 | WANDJI Noah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 5 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 8% |
| 6 | SEIGEL Duncan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 7 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 8 | LEE Jaden | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 9 | LIU William | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 10 | CHANG Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | ||
| 11 | PARK William | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 12 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 13 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 2% |
| 14 | BI Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 15 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 16 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | WEI Winston | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | LI Lucas | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | GOFF Nathaniel | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 20 | LEE Abin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 21 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 23 | CHEN Owen | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 24 | LEE Christopher | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | YUE Jackson | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | WANG sicheng | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Jayden | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 28 | LUK Trusten | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | HONG Edwin | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | CHOI Colin | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | ANDRADE Cedric | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | LEHTINEN Axel | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 35 | SUMIN Yang | - | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | YANG Charles | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 37 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | GORDON William L. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 39 | ZHANG Andrew | - | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | ORNELAS Matteo | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | MIRON Ioachim | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 43 | LI Austin | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Raphael | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHANG Jeremy | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% | ||
| 46 | WONG Braxton | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | ||
| 47 | CHANG Nathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | GUO Joey | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | FOY Grant | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | MAO Runxian | - | 13% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | YE Jerry | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BHANOT Arjun | 29% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | ||
| 53 | MARSHALL Kyler | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | SHU Eric | 60% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | HUANG Nathan | 2% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 57 | CHEUNG Henry | 25% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | ARCARA Evan | 14% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | LIN Evan | 9% | 55% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 60 | HENSTOCK Willem | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CHAN Joseph | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 62 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LIN Alden | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | QIU Yiran | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | SCHAMP Eliot | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 67 | KUMAR Yashvardhan | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.