NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 2 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 3 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% |
| 3 | YAN William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 5 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
| 6 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 7 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 8 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 9 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 10 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | WONG Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 12 | UEMOTO Ken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
| 13 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 14 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 15 | CAI Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 15% |
| 16 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% |
| 18 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 22 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 12% |
| 23 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 24 | WANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 25 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 26 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 27 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 28 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 29 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | WEI William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 32 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 2% |
| 33 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 34 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | - |
| 35 | LI Cooper | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 37 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 38 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% | |
| 39 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | LIU Marvin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ORTHMANN Tristin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | NG Nathaniel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 43 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 45 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Brendan | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 48 | ALSINA Itzel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 2% |
| 49 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 50 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 53 | LEVY Jack | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 54 | JANG Junyeong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 55 | NELSON Micah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | DEMERS Bodhi | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 59 | JARAMILLO Juan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | BAHK Caleb | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 61 | CHU Kaden | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | LI Michael | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 63 | MARCELLINO Robert | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | PARK Inwoo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 65 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | ROMBERG Sam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 67 | MARTINSON Torm | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 68 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 70 | LIU Eric | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 71 | MELE Gianni | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 72 | GREENE Kevin | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 73 | SALDARINI Glenn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 74 | MATTINGLY Ian | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 76 | ORIE Sohan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 77 | NAJI Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 78 | SOMANI Aarav | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | LIU Guanyu | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 80 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 63% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | PERRY Xander | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | BONEVELLY Nikolas | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 85 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | JIN Yubo | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | SUN Stephen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 87 | ZHANG Joseph | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | DAYAMA Ronak | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 90 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 91 | COPP Max | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 92 | LIANA Matthew | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | KHAN Abdur-Rahman | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.