NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 2 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 6% | 33% | 48% | 13% | |
| 3 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 4% | 36% | 59% | |
| 3 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 61% | |
| 5 | LI Joy | - | - | 3% | 21% | 56% | 20% | |
| 6 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 27% | |
| 7 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
| 8 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% |
| 9 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 9% |
| 10 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | 5% | 42% | 52% | |
| 11 | REZA Fukaina | - | 3% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 12 | EYER Brooke | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 13 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 2% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | SIROTA Francis | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% | |
| 15 | LI Junhan | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 16 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 17 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 2% | 19% | 56% | 22% | |
| 18 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 1% | 20% | 48% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 11% | |
| 20 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | 7% | 37% | 50% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 1% | 9% | 37% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | HUANG Sophie | - | 5% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | CAO Amelie | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 24% | 3% | |
| 24 | WAN Celine | 2% | 26% | 48% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | BO Iris | 1% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | PHAN Logan | 3% | 47% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 5% | 44% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | MANGLANI Maya | - | 6% | 32% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHEN lucia | - | - | 1% | 14% | 54% | 30% | |
| 30 | STEWART Isla | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 6% | 47% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | SONG Sarah | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | CHOI Cara | 2% | 19% | 46% | 29% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | CLARK Lillian | 15% | 48% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | DINAR Julia | 32% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 39% | 53% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LENZ Phoebe | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | JAIN Dia | 55% | 41% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | KUI Ava | 48% | 47% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | LOBO Sophie | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | FLANAGAN Sarah | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.