Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Alice | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | TELEB Farida | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 3 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 3 | LIU Ashley | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 5 | YAO Abby | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 6 | CHUNG Katie | - | - | 5% | 38% | 45% | 11% | - |
| 7 | CHANG Olivia | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 54% | 21% |
| 8 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% |
| 9 | HAN Mia | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 10 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 11 | THERON Zoe | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 12 | LIU Ariana | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 13 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% |
| 14 | WANG Doreen | - | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 16% | |
| 15 | SHEN Gloria | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 4% |
| 16 | CHEN Summer | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | XIA Isabella | - | - | 3% | 23% | 53% | 21% | |
| 18 | HSU Rachel | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 48% | 25% |
| 19 | SCHULTZ Sumi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 20 | CHAN Ella | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 21 | JIANG Ziqing | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 22 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 23 | DENG Claire | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 54% | 21% |
| 24 | PARK Lauren | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 25 | SAH Madeleine | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 55% | 9% |
| 26 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% |
| 27 | JIN Jada Y | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | HONG ELSIE | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% | |
| 30 | JENA Aanvi | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% | |
| 31 | HAN Gian | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 32 | CHO Karis | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 33 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 34 | RUI Jessie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% |
| 35 | HAYLETT Emily | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | THOTA Akira | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 37 | KIM Ines | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SAIFEE Sakina | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 5% | 38% | 57% | |
| 40 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 37% | 9% |
| 41 | LEE Abigail | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
| 42 | TEWARI Amaira | - | - | 6% | 40% | 43% | 10% | - |
| 43 | ZHANG Katie Q. | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LIM Kensie | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% |
| 45 | ZHAN Catherine | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | PAN Samantha | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 47 | KIM Natalie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 5% |
| 48 | CHENG Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 49 | YANG Hanli | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 33% | 4% |
| 50 | ESAKI Kei | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
| 51 | KIM Lauren | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 52 | DESAI Zoya | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | HOM Emma | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 54 | LIU Anya | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | ZHANG Viviana | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 56 | ZHU Claire | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | SMIRNOV Victoria | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 58 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 59 | LUCAS Ava | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 60 | KIM Olivia | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | LIN Avery | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 62 | PAWAR Sanvi | 8% | 52% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | TIAN Claire | 5% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 65 | LIGERET Stella | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 14% |
| 66 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 3% | 30% | 49% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | YU Xintong | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 70 | KIM Audrey | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 71 | SMOLICH Emily | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
| 72 | KHANAL Sarah | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 73 | LI Sophia | - | 2% | 20% | 53% | 22% | 2% | |
| 74 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 75 | WU Gloria | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 76 | CHEN Madeleine | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 77 | IRELAND Moira | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 78 | LAVERY Lucy | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 44% | 10% |
| 78 | GOWDA Siyona | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 80 | LI Audrey | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | SAIFEE Zahra | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 82 | DVOIRIS Maya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 83 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 84 | LI Annabelle | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | DONG Nancy | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 86 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 87 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | KO Adeline | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | LAI Olivia | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 90 | AHN Hayley | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 4% | |
| 91 | CHU Lauren | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 92 | LING Camryn | - | - | 6% | 27% | 48% | 18% | 2% |
| 93 | JOESUF Aurielle | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 94 | WANG Ellen | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | YANG Byanca | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
| 96 | LAM Dorris Yandor | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 97 | DUDLEY Kaitrin | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 98 | FU Joy | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | STOCK Nina | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 100 | GUO Jianing | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 101 | LEE Clara | 27% | 48% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 103 | TANG Ming-Hao (Audrey) | 40% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 104 | KIM Ellen | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 105 | ZHANG Annabelle | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 106 | DEJOY Leilah | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | CHOI Jian | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 108 | TATINENI Charvi | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 109 | KIM Rylie | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | LIU Madeleine | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 110 | FENG Sophia | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | JOESUF Thea | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 113 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 16% | 46% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 114 | LIU Sylvia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 1% | 16% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 116 | FAN Lauren | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 118 | KRISHNAN Maya | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 120 | TAI Taphanie | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 121 | CHO Rylee | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | FENG Christy | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 123 | HONDA Emi | 40% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 124 | LUO Olivia | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | YOUN Davina | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 126 | SUN Suri | 8% | 36% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | SHIN Ellie | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 128 | KAIMAN Tabby | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 129 | KIM Chloe | 13% | 43% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 130 | YUEN Hannah | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 131 | TANG Amelia | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 132 | SARANGAN Ovia | 35% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 133 | YANG Claire | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 134 | CHOI Mackenzie | 28% | 48% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 135 | LU Christina | 10% | 48% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
| 136 | JIANG Ziqi | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 137 | SOUSA Lauren | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 137 | HUEMMER Sophia | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.