AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-14 Women's Saber

Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YUEN Nicole 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 75%
2 KWON Hannah 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49%
3 GAY Sasha 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
3 GAIKWAD Ashmiee 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 42%
5 WONG Natalie 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 13%
6 LIN Ariel 100% 100% 93% 68% 30% 5%
7 LONG Chloe 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 14% 1%
8 SENGUPTA Jia 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
9 LONG Jessie 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
10 SUNG Isabella 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 44% 6%
11 LIQUARD Lea 100% 95% 71% 32% 6% -
12 CHEN Cindy 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
13 LAI Karen 100% 99% 93% 68% 30% 5%
14 HWANG Charlotte 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 27%
15 DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 4%
16 LAUREYNS Ainsley 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 4%
17 RAGHURAMAN Anishka 100% 99% 92% 68% 30% 5%
18 KANG Ellie 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
19 CAI Joanna 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 14% 1%
20 SANTIAGO Hannah 100% 98% 76% 30% 4%
21 CHENG Anna 100% 100% 92% 59% 14%
21 YU Skylar 100% 100% 99% 88% 47%
23 HWANG Sophie 100% 100% 99% 90% 55% 14%
24 LIN Rachel 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 9% 1%
25 CHANG Kaitlyn 100% 100% 97% 81% 41% 5%
26 KO Ariel 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 20% 2%
27 BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
28 PEREIRA Izumi 100% 100% 99% 92% 61% 9%
28 CHANG Annette 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 28%
30 DING Jolie 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% -
31 CAO Kim 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 2%
32 SHI Maxine 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
33 CONG Anne 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 76%
34 DUFF Caitlin 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 22%
35 TONG Laurie 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 27%
36 LEE Jadyn 100% 100% 93% 68% 30% 6% -
37 VIGNEUX Nolwenn 100% 95% 69% 30% 7% -
38 NGUYEN Summer 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 12% 1%
39 CORD Sophia 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22% 2%
40 HU Ashley 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 8% 1%
41 CONG Catherine 100% 93% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
42 YE Isabella 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 39% 8%
43 SARATH Sana 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 12% 1%
44 MISHEV Lila 100% 100% 99% 92% 59% 17%
45 SONG Phoebe 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% -
46 TABANCAY Ava 100% 98% 81% 42% 8% -
47 BAEK Aileen 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% -
48 KAZA Ananya 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
49 CHENG Zijuan "Grace" 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 37% 4%
50 BACKES Anastasia 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1% -
51 JUNCO Valentina 100% 78% 38% 10% 1% - -
52 QIU Abigail 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9% -
53 TAN Angela 100% 94% 57% 15% 2% -
54 YANG Renee 100% 52% 13% 2% - -
55 GUERVILLE Angelique 100% 96% 74% 32% 5% -
56 FISCHER Luna 100% 67% 23% 3% - -
57 YU Stella 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
58 ZHOU Carolyn 100% 95% 55% 14% 1%
59 WANG Makayla 100% 98% 85% 52% 17% 2% -
60 SUTHERLAND Sadie 100% 97% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
61 ASHIKHMINA Agniya 100% 95% 69% 29% 6% 1% -
62 ZOFFEL Gabriela 100% 98% 79% 42% 12% 1%
64 KAZA Aditi 100% 96% 61% 17% 2% -
65 JOHNSTON Sabrina 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
66 TRAN Esme 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% -
67 OH Chloe 100% 93% 61% 23% 4% -
68 KISARA-KELLY Aiko 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1% -
69 BI Mia 100% 93% 65% 28% 7% 1% -
70 TSE Lavine 100% 97% 80% 43% 10% 1%
71 ARVIND Heera 100% 80% 40% 11% 2% - -
72 LI Cici 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
73 FANG Lauren 100% 48% 11% 1% - - -
74 MORINAGA Mirai 100% 99% 85% 50% 16% 2%
75 LI Meredith 100% 96% 76% 37% 9% 1%
76 FAN Tina 100% 98% 82% 47% 14% 2%
77 RO Manhattan 100% 32% 4% - - -
78 CUI Andrea 100% 65% 22% 4% - -
79 LEE Chloe 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 10% -
80 YU Sydney 100% 91% 61% 23% 4% - -
81 CHETAN Rhea 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 7% 1%
82 WANG Jennifer 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 14% 2%
83 RIGGS Maren 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
84 RADJABLI Maya 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
85 ATA Emily 100% 47% 10% 1% - -
86 CHENG Hailey 100% 26% 2% - -
86 LOUIE Amelia 100% 96% 75% 37% 10% 1%
88 LUC Madisyn 100% 83% 41% 10% 1% -
90 ARAVIND Aaradhana 100% 51% 13% 2% - - -
91 WOO Sophia 100% 99% 87% 46% 10% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.