Hooked on Fencing - North Royalton, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 2 | MASON Alexander T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |
| 3 | MAURER Scott J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 3 | LINDOW Connor | 100% | 99% | 84% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 5 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 10% |
| 6 | PECKENS Tyler | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 7 | SNELL Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | |
| 8 | SI Anderson | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 9 | MARSHALL John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
| 10 | ZHANG James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% | 1% |
| 11 | BOGARD Matt J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 14% | |
| 12 | BRANG David J. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 13 | KRIEGER Nathanial | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | ORBAI Nicholas | 100% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 15 | BENARD Cormac | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 18 | ECKEL Anson J. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DARRAH Liam | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 80% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.